Handy: The Zombie Movie Encylopedia

Posted by Cory Casciato On March - 19 - 2009

zmeEvery zombie scholar needs reference books and Peter Dendle’s The Zombie Movie Encyclopedia is a solid work that deserves the consideration of any serious zombie researcher. Covering more than 200 movies, from the 1932 Bela Lugosi classic White Zombie through the 1998 body horror of I, Zombie: A Chronicle of Pain, Dendle does an admirable job of collecting nearly every significant zombie work in film (and a few from TV as well) within that time frame into one convenient, easy to read volume. He strikes a nice balance in tone between scholarly and enthusiast, admittedly leaning more toward the scholarly.

He starts with an introduction that provides a succinct history of the zombie in film, broken up into eras such as “The Early Film Zombie (1932-1952),” “The Golden Age (1968-1983)” and “The Mid-’80s Spoof Cycle.” Following that, he spends a couple of pages delving into the significance and meaning of the zombie before wrapping it up with an explanation of his definition of zombies and criteria for movie selection. These elements, especially the definition and selection criteria, are crucial to understanding which films are present and which are omitted. He does a good job setting his boundaries and stays within them for the most part, with a few exceptions. Notably, he says that reanimated humans that retain their personality are not zombies, then goes on to include several movies that feature zombies that retain personality. There are a few other minor “rule bendings” but nothing egregious. The biggest absence some might note is his exclusion of demon-zombies: no Evil Dead here! Wisely, he limits himself to movies he has actually seen. Luckily, this man has seen an awesome amount of zombie movies.

Dendle organizes the movies alphabetically, so it’s easy to find any given entry. Since so many of these movies have numerous alternate titles, he puts in entries referring to the location of a given film’s actual entry under the alternates. The write ups for each movie are fairly concise, although some of the more important movies (and some pretty minor stuff he seemed especially taken with) get several pages of their own. Many of the films’ entries are illustrated with crisp, black-and-white production stills, which helps the overall visual appeal of the book. He comes off even handed and knowledgeable without seeming stuffy for the most part: scholarly yet accessible. At the same time, he does offer what are more or less reviews for these movies, so they are subjective. And like anything subjective, sometimes you’ll agree and sometimes you’ll have to ask, “WTF is he on about?” I don’t want to call him out on too much, but I have to say: Shock Waves? Seriously? That movie was trash and I will never understand why anyone gives it any credit at all.

The book closes with a solid, usable index, a thorough bibliography and a couple of very handy appendices: one lists the movies of the book by country,  the other by year. These are all crucial to make this an actual reference work and they are well done here.

My only real problems with the book can’t be laid at Dendle’s feet. The first is that it cuts off before the 2000s, which turned out to be a crucial decade for zombie cinema. Of course, I recognize that every book has this problem to some degree, unless they are covering a dead art form — it’s not a real complaint, just a disappointment. The real issue is the binding, which split on my copy after relatively minor and careful use. For a work I plan to return to frequently, it’s a real bummer. I wish it had been released in trade paperback instead of hardcover, frankly. It would be cheaper and possibly less fragile to boot. Despite that issue, I have no problem recommending this book to anyone who wants a hard-copy reference work on zombie film. It’s easily one of the best available.

Edit: Added line to indicate book is ordered alphabetically.

4 Responses to “Handy: The Zombie Movie Encylopedia

  1. Biddie says:

    No Evil Dead? Oh man…I have been through about 2 vhs copies and at least 2 dvd copies of this movie. I JUST replaced it again a couple of months ago.
    I might check this book out of I can find it at the library.

  2. Jay Clarke says:

    I wouldn’t consider The Evil Dead to be a zombie film either. The Candarean demons of the Evil Dead series possess humans and use them for their bidding. There’s no cure for a zombie virus, whereas possession can be reversed as seen with Ash in Evil Dead 2. Not to geek out too much here, but I agree with the author in his choice to omit it.

    Great blog btw.

  3. […] the somewhat scholarly Zombie Movie Encyclopedia wasn’t quite the right zombie movie guide for you, then Glenn Kay’s Zombie Movies: The […]

  4. […] of my reference books mention it as a zombie film (the third is Peter Dendle’s excellent Zombie Movie Encyclopedia, which calls it a “lamentable reel stain,” a judgment I feel is unduly harsh for such a […]

Leave a Reply




About Me

The Inevitable Zombie Apocalypse is your source for daily zombie news and in-depth criticism, commentary and context on all things zombie -- zombie movies, zombie books, zombie games and everything else to do with the walking, running, biting dead. You can get more info on the About page, in the FAQ or just by spending a few days reading every piece of content here. You can also follow the site on Twitter or subscribe to RSS by clicking the horde below.



    Scarred Blonde ZombieCollageThe Gaze of UrsulaStay Quiet!Don't Slow DownRaving Mad ManA Crazy ZombieBelgrade Zombie Walk '22.Maman zombiea zombie trapped / Serbian Fantasy Film festival / zombie walk poster shotAntofazombie 2022Antofazombie 2022Antofazombie 2022Antofazombie 2022Antofazombie 2022A Zombie Gaze